NI reduce might hit state pension funding

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s Nationwide Insurance coverage (NI) cuts, which come into impact on Saturday, might hit the long run funding of the state pension and present triple lock.

The primary price of Nationwide Insurance coverage will likely be reduce by two proportion factors tomorrow, from 12% to 10%, as set out within the Autumn Assertion.

Mr Hunt stated: “The reduce in nationwide insurance coverage by 2% implies that a typical household with two earners will likely be practically a thousand kilos higher off this 12 months.”

The change comes forward of rising hypothesis {that a} handful of main tax cuts might be introduced within the spring finances which is ready to be revealed on 6 March.

However Aegon’s pension director Steven Cameron warned that whereas the change has been positioned as a ‘tax’ reduce, “Nationwide Insurance coverage operates otherwise from revenue tax.”

He stated: “First, people above state pension age (presently 66) are already exempt from paying NI. In order that they gained’t see any distinction to their funds.

“Second, in contrast to revenue tax charges that are set by devolved Governments, the NI change will profit these throughout the UK together with these in Scotland, lots of whom face an revenue tax hike come April.

“Third, the NI reduce doesn’t have an effect on the generosity of pensions tax reduction. Had revenue tax been reduce as a substitute of NI, pensions tax reduction would have been diminished accordingly.”

He stated the change raises a priority over how state pensions are funded.

Mr Cameron stated: “At the moment’s state pensions are paid for from the NI of at present’s employees. The reduce will imply much less NI receipts regardless that the state pension is rising by 8.5% in April, greater than double the present price of inflation.

“Our ageing inhabitants, mixed with the present triple lock mechanism, means the prices of state pensions are rising sharply. Decreasing NI contributions, their main supply of funding, provides to the problem, probably requiring different state pension funding sources from basic taxation in future.”


Scroll to Top